In Nevada, if an individual is found guilty of a racketeering crime, Nevada Law provides a list of property that can be civilly forfeited if any property was derived from, through, or used or intended for use in the course of the racketeering activity. This includes title to property, proceeds, property or contractual rights, or positions or offices.
What is Racketeering Activity?
In Nevada, Nev. Rev. Stat. § 207.400 makes it a crime to use or invest any proceeds derived from racketeering activity to obtain property, interest, employment, or anything of value. The specific statutory language of Nev. Rev. Stat. § 207.360 defines “crimes related to racketeering”:
“Crime related to racketeering” means the commission of, attempt to commit or conspiracy to commit any of the following crimes:
Murder;
Manslaughter, except vehicular manslaughter described in NRS 484B.657;
Mayhem;
Battery which is punished as a felony;
Kidnapping;
Sexual assault;
Arson;
Robbery;
Taking property from another under circumstances not amounting to robbery;
Extortion;
Statutory sexual seduction;
Extortionate collection of debt in violation of NRS 205.322;
Forgery, including, without limitation, forgery of a credit card or debit card in violation of NRS 205.740;
Obtaining and using personal identifying information of another person in violation of NRS 205.463;
Establishing or possessing a financial forgery laboratory in violation of NRS 205.46513;
Any violation of NRS 199.280 which is punished as a felony;
Burglary;
Grand larceny;
Bribery or asking for or receiving a bribe in violation of chapter 197 or 199 of NRS which is punished as a felony;
Battery with intent to commit a crime in violation of NRS 200.400;
Involuntary servitude in violation of any provision of NRS 200.463 or 200.464 or a violation of any provision of NRS 200.465; or
Trafficking in persons in violation of any provision of NRS 200.467 or 200.468.
Property Subject to Civil Forfeiture under Nev. Rev. Stat. § 207.460
Any property that is derived from the proceeds of the racketeering activity at issue is subject to civil forfeiture under Nevada law. Nev. Rev. Stat. § 207.460 provides the exact statutory language:
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, the following are subject to civil forfeiture to the State;
(a) All property, real or personal, including money used in the course of, intended for use in the course of, derived from or gained through conduct in violation of NRS 207.400;
(b) Any title or interest a person has acquired or maintained in violation of NRS 207.400; and
Top Rated Criminal Lawyer
Nick Wooldridge has a long track record of representing clients accused of serious federal and state crimes in Nevada.
(c) Any property or contractual right which affords a source of influence over any enterprise established, operated, controlled, participated in or conducted in violation of NRS 207.400.
Upon a showing by the owner of the requisite facts, the following is not subject to forfeiture under this section:
(a) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b), property used without the knowledge or consent of its owner; and
(b) A means of transportation used by a person in the transaction of business as a common carrier unless it appears the owner or person in charge of the common carrier consented to or had knowledge of the violation of NRS 207.400.
Charged with a Crime in Las Vegas? Contact an Experienced Criminal Defense Attorney Today
If you or a family member has been charged with a crime in or around Las Vegas, you need to be proactive in protecting your rights. You can accomplish this by retaining the services of a skilled and experienced Las Vegas criminal defense attorney. You should also make sure your case is handled by a seasoned lawyer who exclusively deals with criminal cases in Las Vegas, Nevada. Take action today by contacting LV Criminal Defense. Our legal team is fully capable of representing clients in the smallest misdemeanor cases and the most serious felony cases. Call 702-623-6362 or fill out a quick contact form here.
What Our Clients Are Saying
When I initially met with Mr. Wooldridge, he took the opportunity to sit and go over my problem with me. He described details in my case which he found disturbing and explained why he I should have him on my side.